Two Sides country managers from around the world recently convened to discuss the impact of its anti-greenwash campaign. This includes eradicating instances where companies make misleading, anti-print and paper messages in their customer communications.
Country managers at the annual meeting included representatives from South Africa, Europe, North America, South America, Australia and New Zealand. Since its inception, Two Sides’ anti-greenwash campaign has investigated 921 organisations worldwide. Of these, over two-thirds were found to be using unsubstantiated claims regarding paper’s impact on the environment, usually in breach of local advertising regulations. After being challenged by Two Sides, 335 organisations removed or changed their messaging.
In a joint statement, Two Sides’ country managers stated, ‘We are thrilled to be able to report the latest global anti-greenwash results. The Anti-Greenwash campaign is such an important initiative because without Two Sides’ intervention there would be no other body holding these organisations to account.
But despite the success of the campaign, as well as clear rules on unsubstantiated environmental claims, greenwash tactics are still commonplace. Everyday, new claims are brought to the attention of Two Sides, ranging from seemingly-harmless ‘think before you print’ email signatures, to the world’s biggest banks telling tens-of-millions of their customers that paper is bad for the environment.’
Common consumer misconceptions about print and paper are being reinforced by service providers as they increasingly encourage their customers to switch to electronic bills, statements and correspondence. Often the incentive to switch is based on unfounded environmental claims such as ‘Go Green – Go Paperless’ and ‘Choose e-billing and help save a tree.’
Not only are these claims misleading, but the drive to digital is not always welcomed by consumers. In a survey commissioned Two Sides, over 10,000 consumers around the globe were asked about their preferences for print. Key findings include:
• 89% believe they have the right to choose how they receive communications (printed or electronically) from financial organisations and service providers.
• 77% believe they should not be charged more for choosing a paper bill or statement.
• 73% keep hard copies of important documents filed at home, as they believe this is the safest and most secure way of storing information.
• 69% agree going 'paperless' is not really 'paperless' because they regularly have to print out documents at home.
• 62% agree that incentives to switch to digital because it is ‘better for the environment’ are actually because the sender wants to save money.
The country managers further stated: ‘Two Sides, of course, recognises there is a place for digital communication in today’s ever-online world, but we must not force change as a blanket policy on all consumers, particularly under the guise of misleading and unsubstantiated environmental claims. Two Sides asks all services providers to take a fair and honest approach to their communications and ensure that consumers remain free to choose paper, without charge or difficulty.’
If you see instances of greenwash messages, please send the details to email@example.com.